<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Billy Bob Interview: Worst Case Scenario</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ryantrauman.com/traumanblog/2009/04/11/billy-bob-interview-worst-case-scenario/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ryantrauman.com/traumanblog/2009/04/11/billy-bob-interview-worst-case-scenario/</link>
	<description>Learning to Live With My Own Reflections. Trauman&#039;s Blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:33:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Wright</title>
		<link>http://ryantrauman.com/traumanblog/2009/04/11/billy-bob-interview-worst-case-scenario/comment-page-1/#comment-2844</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 04:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryantrauman.com/traumanblog/?p=242#comment-2844</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s interesting how Billy Bob turned that encounter into an actual engagement, but no one in the youtube comments gives him credit for that. They seem to think he&#039;s being an ass. Also interesting that once the interviewer plugs in and begins really interacting, he asks about the audience that they&#039;re playing to--Willie Nelson&#039;s--and admits that he *assumes* that they&#039;re a certain way. I like the use of that word, since he&#039;s admitting in some subtle way the problem. Then Thornton can respond without correcting him, by saying they&#039;re actually an eclectic bunch. 

So, Rilke&#039;s understanding might boil down to &quot;watch the assumptions you make.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting how Billy Bob turned that encounter into an actual engagement, but no one in the youtube comments gives him credit for that. They seem to think he&#8217;s being an ass. Also interesting that once the interviewer plugs in and begins really interacting, he asks about the audience that they&#8217;re playing to&#8211;Willie Nelson&#8217;s&#8211;and admits that he *assumes* that they&#8217;re a certain way. I like the use of that word, since he&#8217;s admitting in some subtle way the problem. Then Thornton can respond without correcting him, by saying they&#8217;re actually an eclectic bunch. </p>
<p>So, Rilke&#8217;s understanding might boil down to &#8220;watch the assumptions you make.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Wright</title>
		<link>http://ryantrauman.com/traumanblog/2009/04/11/billy-bob-interview-worst-case-scenario/comment-page-1/#comment-2843</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryantrauman.com/traumanblog/?p=242#comment-2843</guid>
		<description>Naturally, they call it Billy Bob&#039;s &quot;blow up.&quot; 

Makes me wonder how many of the celebrity &quot;tirades&quot; are just frustrated requests for everyone else to catch up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naturally, they call it Billy Bob&#8217;s &#8220;blow up.&#8221; </p>
<p>Makes me wonder how many of the celebrity &#8220;tirades&#8221; are just frustrated requests for everyone else to catch up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Wright</title>
		<link>http://ryantrauman.com/traumanblog/2009/04/11/billy-bob-interview-worst-case-scenario/comment-page-1/#comment-2842</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryantrauman.com/traumanblog/?p=242#comment-2842</guid>
		<description>Firstly, firstly is a dumb word.

Second, I respect Billy Bob more now. You know what it&#039;s like when someone isn&#039;t really talking to you? When one of your friends or acquaintances assumes you instead of communicates with you--that maybe you&#039;re a liberal or a socialite or that you&#039;re not that smart because one time a hundred years ago you were one of those things? That&#039;s what it seems like to me--like that interviewer had a &quot;trajectory&quot; he was trying to push through. He isn&#039;t actually questioning and interacting with Billy Bob in an immediate way, or even a respectful one, though of course immediacy is the highest respect we can pay. But that&#039;s why he gets so rattled when it doesn&#039;t follow that expected path. He was asking from the beginning with his whole body to just let it go as planned--to have a canned non-interaction--that&#039;s where he gets his surface confidence from. His surety in giving the pat questions and receiving pat answers that aren&#039;t real answers but are ones he assumes his audience wants. And Billy Bob says &quot;Fuck no buddy, this is really happening. *Now* it&#039;s happening. See how that works?&quot;

It&#039;s like an enactment of Rilke, or the kind of consciousness Rilke recommends. In his Letters to a Young Poet, Rilke talks about courage, the only kind that may be required of us, he says--to accept, welcome and embrace the strange and singular: &quot;For it is not inertia alone that is responsible for human relationships repeating themselves from case to case, indescribably monotonous and unrenewed: it is shyness before any sort of new, unforeseeable experience with which one does not think oneself able to cope.... For if we think of this existence of the individual as a larger or smaller room, it appears evident that most people learn to know only a corner of their room, a place by the window, a strip of floor on which they walk up and down. Thus they have a certain security.&quot;

Billy Bob takes us into a much larger room where we and that interviewer don&#039;t know what&#039;s going to happen next. No wonder Angelina liked him. And the interviewer needs him to stay within the limited confines, tries to bully him into them.  &quot;C&#039;mon man, let&#039;s just say Music is your first love, because it&#039;s nice and pat and sells things.&quot; And it&#039;s a lie, it&#039;s a fabrication, and Billy Bob won&#039;t do it; it&#039;s not worth it.  It&#039;s amazing to me to see people who are that big. Big enough to so completely fill their own shoes, they stay in them no matter what else comes along.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly, firstly is a dumb word.</p>
<p>Second, I respect Billy Bob more now. You know what it&#8217;s like when someone isn&#8217;t really talking to you? When one of your friends or acquaintances assumes you instead of communicates with you&#8211;that maybe you&#8217;re a liberal or a socialite or that you&#8217;re not that smart because one time a hundred years ago you were one of those things? That&#8217;s what it seems like to me&#8211;like that interviewer had a &#8220;trajectory&#8221; he was trying to push through. He isn&#8217;t actually questioning and interacting with Billy Bob in an immediate way, or even a respectful one, though of course immediacy is the highest respect we can pay. But that&#8217;s why he gets so rattled when it doesn&#8217;t follow that expected path. He was asking from the beginning with his whole body to just let it go as planned&#8211;to have a canned non-interaction&#8211;that&#8217;s where he gets his surface confidence from. His surety in giving the pat questions and receiving pat answers that aren&#8217;t real answers but are ones he assumes his audience wants. And Billy Bob says &#8220;Fuck no buddy, this is really happening. *Now* it&#8217;s happening. See how that works?&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like an enactment of Rilke, or the kind of consciousness Rilke recommends. In his Letters to a Young Poet, Rilke talks about courage, the only kind that may be required of us, he says&#8211;to accept, welcome and embrace the strange and singular: &#8220;For it is not inertia alone that is responsible for human relationships repeating themselves from case to case, indescribably monotonous and unrenewed: it is shyness before any sort of new, unforeseeable experience with which one does not think oneself able to cope&#8230;. For if we think of this existence of the individual as a larger or smaller room, it appears evident that most people learn to know only a corner of their room, a place by the window, a strip of floor on which they walk up and down. Thus they have a certain security.&#8221;</p>
<p>Billy Bob takes us into a much larger room where we and that interviewer don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s going to happen next. No wonder Angelina liked him. And the interviewer needs him to stay within the limited confines, tries to bully him into them.  &#8220;C&#8217;mon man, let&#8217;s just say Music is your first love, because it&#8217;s nice and pat and sells things.&#8221; And it&#8217;s a lie, it&#8217;s a fabrication, and Billy Bob won&#8217;t do it; it&#8217;s not worth it.  It&#8217;s amazing to me to see people who are that big. Big enough to so completely fill their own shoes, they stay in them no matter what else comes along.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

