<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rhetorical Value of Writing Program Archives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ryantrauman.com/blog/2009/11/04/rhetorical-value-of-writing-program-archives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ryantrauman.com/blog/2009/11/04/rhetorical-value-of-writing-program-archives/</link>
	<description>Trauman&#039;s Blog: Writing. Reading. Technology. Book History. Book Future. Digital Scholarship. Blogging. Teaching.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:13:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trauman</title>
		<link>http://ryantrauman.com/blog/2009/11/04/rhetorical-value-of-writing-program-archives/comment-page-1/#comment-8164</link>
		<dc:creator>Trauman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryantrauman.com/blog/?p=707#comment-8164</guid>
		<description>LOVE, LOVE, LOVE your spirited response!

And I don&#039;t really like the WordCount thingy,either. Just trying it out, so see how it works. Been working so far, sort of like learning to eat broccoli, I think. Once you get used to it, you don&#039;t need to remind yourself that it&#039;s good for you anymore.

I&#039;m curious, though, what you think it represents, or what it represents to you. For me, it&#039;s an expression of trying to learn consistency and discipline. Which I suspect will make me a better writer. It might backfire, though. I will certainly keep you updated. And I appreciate your honesty. Can always count on that from you. And I LOVE it!

Now, off to track down that CliC center info. Would appreciate any direction you might offer. 

Will be curious to see how you react (if at all, really) to the entry about why I care about digital writing technologies at all.

Again, thanks for posting. Hopefully, others will join you!

T.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOVE, LOVE, LOVE your spirited response!</p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t really like the WordCount thingy,either. Just trying it out, so see how it works. Been working so far, sort of like learning to eat broccoli, I think. Once you get used to it, you don&#8217;t need to remind yourself that it&#8217;s good for you anymore.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious, though, what you think it represents, or what it represents to you. For me, it&#8217;s an expression of trying to learn consistency and discipline. Which I suspect will make me a better writer. It might backfire, though. I will certainly keep you updated. And I appreciate your honesty. Can always count on that from you. And I LOVE it!</p>
<p>Now, off to track down that CliC center info. Would appreciate any direction you might offer. </p>
<p>Will be curious to see how you react (if at all, really) to the entry about why I care about digital writing technologies at all.</p>
<p>Again, thanks for posting. Hopefully, others will join you!</p>
<p>T.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cheryl</title>
		<link>http://ryantrauman.com/blog/2009/11/04/rhetorical-value-of-writing-program-archives/comment-page-1/#comment-8163</link>
		<dc:creator>cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryantrauman.com/blog/?p=707#comment-8163</guid>
		<description>LOVED the previous post that outlines what data you want to collect. 

HATE the Word Count tool you have posted here. Not the thing itself, but what it represents. But if it works for you, great!

LOVE this post as a start to your lit review (I&#039;m guessing). Can&#039;t wait to read more. Makes me think of Carter and Dunbar-Odom&#039;s work with the CliC center.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOVED the previous post that outlines what data you want to collect. </p>
<p>HATE the Word Count tool you have posted here. Not the thing itself, but what it represents. But if it works for you, great!</p>
<p>LOVE this post as a start to your lit review (I&#8217;m guessing). Can&#8217;t wait to read more. Makes me think of Carter and Dunbar-Odom&#8217;s work with the CliC center.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
